Premium
Chromosomal breakpoints characterization of two supernumerary ring chromosomes 20
Author(s) -
Guediche N.,
Brisset S.,
Benichou J.J.,
Guérin N.,
Mabboux P.,
Maurin M.L.,
Bas C.,
Laroudie M.,
Picone O.,
Goldszmidt D.,
Prévot S.,
Labrune P.,
Tachdjian G.
Publication year - 2010
Publication title -
american journal of medical genetics part a
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.064
H-Index - 112
eISSN - 1552-4833
pISSN - 1552-4825
DOI - 10.1002/ajmg.a.33250
Subject(s) - small supernumerary marker chromosome , supernumerary , ring chromosome , biology , genetics , karyotype , breakpoint , chromosome , craniofacial , fluorescence in situ hybridization , marker chromosome , cytogenetics , anatomy , gene
The occurrence of an additional ring chromosome 20 is a rare chromosome abnormality, and no common phenotype has been yet described. We report on two new patients presenting with a supernumerary ring chromosome 20 both prenatally diagnosed. The first presented with intrauterine growth retardation and some craniofacial dysmorphism, and the second case had a normal phenotype except for obesity. Conventional cytogenetic studies showed for each patient a small supernumerary marker chromosome (SMC). Using fluorescence in situ hybridization, these SMCs corresponded to ring chromosomes 20 including a part of short and long arms of chromosome 20. Detailed molecular cytogenetic characterization showed different breakpoints (20p11.23 and 20q11.23 for Patient 1 and 20p11.21 and 20q11.21 for Patient 2) and sizes of the two ring chromosomes 20 (13.6 Mb for case 1 and 4.8 Mb for case 2). Review of the 13 case reports of an extra r(20) ascertained postnatally (8 cases) and prenatally (5 cases) showed varying degrees of phenotypic abnormalities. We document a detailed molecular cytogenetic chromosomal breakpoints characterization of two cases of supernumerary ring chromosomes 20. These results emphasize the need to characterize precisely chromosomal breakpoints of supernumerary ring chromosomes 20 in order to establish genotype–phenotype correlation. This report may be helpful for prediction of natural history and outcome, particularly in prenatal diagnosis. © 2010 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.