z-logo
Premium
Effects of MECP2 mutation type, location and X‐inactivation in modulating Rett syndrome phenotype
Author(s) -
Weaving Linda S.,
Williamson Sarah L.,
Bennetts Bruce,
Davis Mark,
Ellaway Carolyn J.,
Leonard Helen,
Thong MeowKeong,
Delatycki Martin,
Thompson Elizabeth M.,
Laing Nigel,
Christodoulou John
Publication year - 2002
Publication title -
american journal of medical genetics part a
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.064
H-Index - 112
eISSN - 1552-4833
pISSN - 1552-4825
DOI - 10.1002/ajmg.a.10053
Subject(s) - mecp2 , rett syndrome , phenotype , mutation , genetics , biology , gene
Rett syndrome (RTT) is a clinically defined disorder that describes a subset of patients with mutations in the X‐linked MECP2 gene. However, there is a high degree of variability in the clinical phenotypes produced by mutations in MECP2 , even amongst classical RTT patients. In a large‐scale screening project, this variability has been examined by looking at the effects of mutation type, functional domain affected and X‐inactivation. Mutations have been identified in 60% of RTT patients in this study (25% of whom were atypical), including 23 novel mutations and polymorphisms. More mutations were found in classical patients (63%) compared to atypical patients (44%). All of the pathogenic mutations were de novo in patients for whom parent DNA was available for screening. A composite phenotype score was developed, based on the recommendations for reporting clinical features in RTT of an international collaborative group. This score proved useful for summarising phenotypic severity, but did not correlate with mutation type, domain affected or X‐inactivation, probably due to complex interactions between all three. Other correlations suggested that truncating mutations and mutations affecting the methyl‐CpG‐binding domain tend to lead to a more severe phenotype. Skewed X‐inactivation was found in a large proportion (43%) of our patients, particularly in those with truncating mutations and mutations affecting the MBD. It is therefore likely that X‐inactivation does modulate the phenotype in RTT. © 2003 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.

This content is not available in your region!

Continue researching here.

Having issues? You can contact us here