Premium
Associations between a safety prequalification survey and worker safety experiences on commercial construction sites
Author(s) -
Dennerlein Jack T.,
Weinstein Daniel,
Huynh Whitney,
Tessler Jamie,
Bigger Lauren,
Murphy Lauren,
Manjourides Justin
Publication year - 2020
Publication title -
american journal of industrial medicine
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.7
H-Index - 104
eISSN - 1097-0274
pISSN - 0271-3586
DOI - 10.1002/ajim.23143
Subject(s) - safety climate , occupational safety and health , medicine , construction industry , bidding , environmental health , poison control , human factors and ergonomics , operations management , business , marketing , engineering , pathology , construction engineering
Background While assessment of subcontractors' safety performance during project bidding processes are common in commercial construction, the validation of organizational surveys used in these processes is largely absent. Methods As part of a larger research project called Assessment of Contractor Safety (ACES), we designed and tested through a cross‐sectional study, a 63‐item organizational survey assessing subcontractors' leading indicators of safety performance. We administered the ACES Survey to 43 subcontractors on 24 construction sites. Concurrently, we captured the safety climate of 1426 workers on these sites through worker surveys, as well as injury rates, for the duration of the project. Results At the worksite level, higher average ACES scores were associated with higher worker safety climate scores ( P < .01) and lower rates of injury involving days away ( P < .001). Within subcontracting companies, no associations were observed between ACES and worker safety climate scores and injuries. Conclusions These results suggest the overall and collective importance of the construction project and its worksite in mediating worker experiences, perhaps somewhat independent of the individual subcontractor level.