Premium
Facilitators and barriers to the adoption of ergonomic solutions in construction
Author(s) -
Dale Ann Marie,
Jaegers Lisa,
Welch Laura,
Barnidge Ellen,
Weaver Nancy,
Evanoff Bradley A.
Publication year - 2017
Publication title -
american journal of industrial medicine
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.7
H-Index - 104
eISSN - 1097-0274
pISSN - 0271-3586
DOI - 10.1002/ajim.22693
Subject(s) - human factors and ergonomics , participatory ergonomics , medicine , work (physics) , citizen journalism , occupational safety and health , operations management , poison control , knowledge management , environmental health , engineering , computer science , mechanical engineering , pathology , world wide web
Background Rates of musculoskeletal disorders in construction remain high. Few studies have described barriers and facilitators to the use of available ergonomic solutions. This paper describes these barriers and facilitators and their relationship to the level of adoption. Methods Three analysts rated 16 proposed ergonomic solutions from a participatory ergonomics study and assessed the level of adoption, six adoption characteristics, and identified the category of adoption from a theoretical model. Results Twelve solutions were always or intermittently used and were rated positively for characteristics of relative advantage, compatibility with existing work processes and trialability. Locus of control (worker vs. contractor) was not related to adoption. Simple solutions faced fewer barriers to adoption than those rated as complex. Conclusions Specific adoption characteristics can help predict the use of new ergonomic solutions in construction. Adoption of complex solutions must involve multiple stakeholders, more time, and shifts in culture or work systems. Am. J. Ind. Med. 60:295–305, 2017. © 2017 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.