z-logo
Premium
Collegium Ramazzini: Comments on the 2014 Helsinki consensus report on asbestos
Author(s) -
Baur Xaver,
Frank Arthur L.,
Budnik Lygia Therese,
Woitowitz Hans Joachim,
Oliver L. Christine,
Welch Laura Stewart,
Landrigan Philip,
Lemen Richard
Publication year - 2016
Publication title -
american journal of industrial medicine
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.7
H-Index - 104
eISSN - 1097-0274
pISSN - 0271-3586
DOI - 10.1002/ajim.22595
Subject(s) - asbestos , asbestosis , medicine , occupational medicine , family medicine , environmental health , occupational exposure , materials science , metallurgy
The Collegium Ramazzini is an international scientific society that examines critical issues in occupational and environmental medicine with a view towards action to prevent disease and promote health. The Collegium derives its name from Bernardino Ramazzini, the father of occupational medicine, a professor of medicine of the Universities of Modena and Padua in the late 1600s and the early 1700s. The Collegium is comprised of 180 physicians and scientists from 35 countries, each of whom is elected to membership. The Collegium is independent of commercial interests. TheCollegiumRamazzini recognizes thework of the 2014 expert committee convened by the Finnish Institute of Occupational Health (FIOH) to update the 1997 and 2000 Helsinki criteria onAsbestos, Asbestosis, andCancer in light of newadvances in research.Thepublishedconsensus report of the Helsinki Committee [Wolff et al., 2015] and its more extensive on-line version (Helsinki Criteria Update 2014 Asbestos, Asbestosis, and Cancer) provide a valuable synthesis of many aspects of current knowledge of the hazards of asbestos. The Collegium Ramazzini is, however, very concerned about the sections of the 2014 Helsinki consensus report that discuss criteria for pathological diagnosis of the diseases caused by asbestos. The sections of the Helsinki report dealing with pathology diagnosis are based on a selective reading of the medical literature. They rely overly much on certain published articles [Srebro et al., 1995; Butnor et al., 2003; Roggli et al., 2010] while omitting reference to other important and highly relevant information. They are heavily influenced by the outdated and incorrect concept that analysis of lung tissue for asbestos fibers and asbestos bodies can provide data to contradict exposures that are documented in a reliable occupational history. Further, without any explanation the most accepted College of American Pathologists (CAP)-NIOSH 1982 asbestos definition which underwent extensive review and endorsement by NIOSH is now replaced in the 2014 Helsinki criteria by the more restrictive CAP/Pulmonary Pathology Society (PPS) modification which differs especially in the early histological stages of asbestosis and in the higher numbers of asbestos bodies needed to make the pathological diagnosis of asbestosis [Hammar and Abraham, 2015]. Applying the 2014 Helsinki report recommendations on pathology diagnosis will lead to:

This content is not available in your region!

Continue researching here.

Having issues? You can contact us here