Premium
Are green building features safe for preventive maintenance workers? Examining the evidence
Author(s) -
Omar Mohamed Shamun,
Quinn Margaret M.,
Buchholz Bryan,
Geiser Ken
Publication year - 2013
Publication title -
american journal of industrial medicine
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.7
H-Index - 104
eISSN - 1097-0274
pISSN - 0271-3586
DOI - 10.1002/ajim.22166
Subject(s) - certification , occupational safety and health , medicine , environmental design , rating system , harm , hazard , architectural engineering , environmental health , civil engineering , engineering , environmental economics , pathology , political science , law , economics , chemistry , organic chemistry
Background Many newly constructed green buildings (GB) are certified using the United States Green Building Council (USGBC) Leadership in Energy and Environmental Design (LEED) rating system for new construction and major renovation which focuses on architectural and mechanical design to conserve energy, reduce environmental harm, and enhance indoor quality for occupants. This study evaluated the preventive maintenance (PM) worker occupational safety and health (OSH) risks related to the design of GB. Methods PM job hazard analyses (JHA) were performed on the tasks required to operate and maintain five GB features selected from 13 LEED certified GB. A 22‐item JHA and OSH risk scoring system were developed. Results Potentially serious OSH hazards included: green roofs made of slippery material without fall protection; energy recovery wheels and storm water harvesting systems in confined spaces; skylights without guard rails; and tight geothermal well mechanical rooms constraining safe preventive practices. Conclusions GB can present PM OSH risks and these should be eliminated in the building design phase. Am. J. Ind. Med. 56:410–423, 2013. © 2013 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.