z-logo
Premium
Physical examination has a low yield in screening for carpal tunnel syndrome
Author(s) -
Dale Ann Marie,
Descatha Alexis,
Coomes Justin,
Franzblau Alfred,
Evanoff Bradley
Publication year - 2011
Publication title -
american journal of industrial medicine
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.7
H-Index - 104
eISSN - 1097-0274
pISSN - 0271-3586
DOI - 10.1002/ajim.20915
Subject(s) - medicine , carpal tunnel syndrome , physical examination , physical therapy , median nerve , nerve conduction study , nerve conduction , population , neurological examination , physical medicine and rehabilitation , surgery , environmental health
Background Physical examination is often used to screen workers for carpal tunnel syndrome (CTS). In a population of newly hired workers, we evaluated the yield of such screening. Methods Our study population included 1,108 newly hired workers in diverse industries. Baseline data included a symptom questionnaire, physical exam, and bilateral nerve conduction testing of the median and ulnar nerves; individual results were not shared with the employer. We tested three outcomes: symptoms of CTS, abnormal median nerve conduction, and a case definition of CTS that required both symptoms and median neuropathy. Results Of the exam measures used, only Semmes–Weinstein sensory testing had a sensitivity value above 31%. Positive predictive values were low, and likelihood ratios were all under 5.0 for positive testing and over 0.2 for negative testing. Conclusion Physical examination maneuvers have a low yield for the diagnosis of CTS in workplace surveillance programs and in post‐offer, pre‐placement screening programs. Am. J. Ind. Med. 54:1–9, 2011. © 2010 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.

This content is not available in your region!

Continue researching here.

Having issues? You can contact us here
Accelerating Research

Address

John Eccles House
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom