Premium
Improving the quality of industry and occupation data at a central cancer registry
Author(s) -
Armenti Karla R.,
Celaya Maria O.,
Cherala Sai,
Riddle Bruce,
Schumacher Pamela K.,
Rees Judy R.
Publication year - 2010
Publication title -
american journal of industrial medicine
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.7
H-Index - 104
eISSN - 1097-0274
pISSN - 0271-3586
DOI - 10.1002/ajim.20851
Subject(s) - medicine , audit , data quality , session (web analytics) , cancer registry , medical record , family medicine , cancer , database , surgery , accounting , operations management , world wide web , metric (unit) , computer science , economics , business
Background Central cancer registries are required to collect industry and occupation (I/O) information when available, but the data reported are often incomplete. Methods We audited the completeness of I/O data in the New Hampshire State Cancer Registry (NHSCR) database for diagnosis year 2005, and reviewed medical records for a convenience sample of 474 of these cases. We compared I/O data quality before and after a statewide registrar training session on occupationally related cancers. Results The original 2005 data contained both I/O data in 11.5% of cases, and lacked any I/O data in 74.5%. Corresponding figures for cases selected for audit were 15.2% and 77.2%, which improved to 54.2% and 11.8% after medical record review. After registrar training, 47% of reports contained both I/O data, and only 14.4% of cases lacked any I/O data. Conclusions Statewide training to highlight the importance of I/O data is an effective method to improve I/O data quality. Am. J. Ind. Med. 53:995–1001, 2010. © 2010 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.