Premium
Exposure to respirable dust and crystalline silica in bricklaying education at Dutch vocational training centers
Author(s) -
Huizer Daan,
Spee Ton,
Lumens Mieke,
Kromhout Hans
Publication year - 2010
Publication title -
american journal of industrial medicine
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.7
H-Index - 104
eISSN - 1097-0274
pISSN - 0271-3586
DOI - 10.1002/ajim.20823
Subject(s) - medicine , vocational education , occupational exposure , training (meteorology) , environmental health , medical education , meteorology , pedagogy , psychology , physics
Background Construction workers are educated at vocational training centers before they begin their working lives. Future bricklayers and their instructors are exposed to respirable dust and possibly to hazardous respirable crystalline silica from trial mortar. Methods Thirty‐six personal air samples were collected at six training centers to estimate exposure to respirable dust for both students and teachers. A selection of 22 samples was analyzed for crystalline silica. Results Average respirable dust exposures ranged from 0.59 mg/m 3 for teachers to 1.45 mg/m 3 for students performing recycling and cleaning tasks. In 45% of the analyzed samples, respirable crystalline silica was detected. Exposure to silica remained below the Dutch OEL (75 µg/m 3 ). Exposure was significantly less for teachers than for students. This effect was found in both types of vocational training centers present in the Netherlands. Dry sweeping, as performed at all locations in this study, contributed considerably to the exposure to respirable dust. A first step in reducing exposure to dust and silica at training centers would therefore be to avoid dry sweeping. The presence of a dust extraction system, although not optimally designed, also significantly lowered exposure. Conclusions To assess a construction worker's lifetime exposure to respirable dust and crystalline silica, the vocational training period should also be taken into account. Several epidemiological studies have shown that time since first exposure can be an important risk factor for chronic health effects. Am. J. Ind. Med. 53: 628–634, 2010. © 2010 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.