Premium
Hearing problems among a cohort of nationally certified EMS professionals
Author(s) -
Fernandez Antonio R.,
Crawford J. Mac,
Studnek Jonathan R.,
Wilkins J.R.
Publication year - 2010
Publication title -
american journal of industrial medicine
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.7
H-Index - 104
eISSN - 1097-0274
pISSN - 0271-3586
DOI - 10.1002/ajim.20785
Subject(s) - medicine , logistic regression , hearing loss , cohort , odds ratio , cohort study , audiology
Abstract Purpose The objectives of this study were to estimate the prevalence of hearing problems among a national cohort of emergency medical service (EMS) professionals, determine factors associated with hearing problems, and estimate the percentage of EMS professionals who utilize hearing protection. Methods Utilizing results from a questionnaire, individuals who reported hearing problems were compared to individuals who had not. Multivariable logistic regression was performed to identify variables associated with hearing problems. Finally, items regarding use of hearing protection were assessed to estimate the percentage of usage among EMS professionals. Results In total, 1,058 (57%) participants responded to the questionnaire. Of those, 1,024 (97%) who completed the hearing problems question were utilized for analysis. There were 153 (14.9%) cases of self‐reported hearing problems. The final logistic regression model included lifetime occupational noise exposure 0.99 (95% CI = 0.9997–1.0002), report of previous back problems (odds ratio (OR) = 2.74, 95% CI = 1.8340–4.1042), large community size (OR = 1.67, 95% CI = 1.1211–2.4843), and minority status (OR = 0.61, 95% CI = 0.3719–0.9867). Finally, 213 (20.8%) individuals reported utilizing some form of hearing protection at their main EMS job. Conclusion The results from this analysis are the first national estimates of the prevalence of self reported hearing problems among EMS professionals. This study was also the first to estimate the percentage of EMS professionals who self reported the utilization of hearing protection. Am. J. Ind. Med. 53:264–275, 2010. © 2009 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.