Premium
Effect of tractor driving on hearing loss in farmers in India
Author(s) -
Kumar Adarsh,
Mathur N.N.,
Varghese Mathew,
Mohan Dinesh,
Singh J.K.,
Mahajan Punnet
Publication year - 2005
Publication title -
american journal of industrial medicine
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.7
H-Index - 104
eISSN - 1097-0274
pISSN - 0271-3586
DOI - 10.1002/ajim.20143
Subject(s) - tractor , audiogram , hearing loss , medicine , environmental health , noise (video) , occupational safety and health , audiometry , audiology , toxicology , automotive engineering , engineering , computer science , pathology , artificial intelligence , image (mathematics) , biology
Background Indian tractor drivers operate their tractors and other implements/equipment in an environment which can have extreme temperatures and high level of suspended particulate matter. In addition, Indian tractors do not have adequate vibration and noise attenuating designs features. This cross‐sectional study compares the hearing status of tractor driving farmers (TDFs) (study group) and non‐tractor driving farmers (NTDFs) (control group) matched for age, sex, generic/ethnic group, land holding, education levels, and work routines. Method Two groups of 50 experienced tractor‐driving farmers and 50 non‐driving farmers were selected from 2 villages, 50 km from Delhi. All participants were interviewed for details of work routine and noise exposures. An audiogram was performed and noise measurements taken on tractors and other machines. Results Self‐reported hearing problems were similar (4 cases each) in both the groups of 50 farmers. However, audiogram analysis showed higher prevalence of abnormalities in TDFs. TDFs (24) had more often high frequency hearing loss when compared to NTDFs (14). The noise levels observed on tractors in different operations were in the range of 90–110 dB (A). Conclusions Tractor noise levels exceeded the recommended safe limits of OSHA and NIOSH prescribed standards. TDFs had higher high frequency hearing loss than NTDFs. The mechanism of damage and prevention needs to be studied further. Am. J. Ind. Med. 47:341–348, 2005. © 2005 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.