Premium
Exposure to endosulfan in farmers: Two case studies
Author(s) -
Brandt Victoria A.,
Moon Sam,
Ehlers Janet,
Methner Mark M.,
Struttmann Tim
Publication year - 2001
Publication title -
american journal of industrial medicine
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.7
H-Index - 104
eISSN - 1097-0274
pISSN - 0271-3586
DOI - 10.1002/ajim.1064
Subject(s) - endosulfan , medicine , toxicology , personal protective equipment , pesticide , environmental health , occupational exposure , biology , covid-19 , pathology , disease , infectious disease (medical specialty) , agronomy
Background Endosulfan is not a restricted use organochlorine insecticide and is currently under re‐registration review. In 1993, one confirmed case and one possible case of endosulfan poisoning in agricultural workers occurred in two southeastern states. Methods Two cases of suspected endosulfan poisoning were investigated utilizing record reviews, blood samples, a site visit, and clothing analysis. Results Case 1 was fatal; Case 2 resulted in permanent neurological impairment. Additionally, Case 1 mixed and applied two less toxic pesticides, acephate and maleic hydrazide to tobacco plants. Both farm owners had ample opportunity for endosulfan exposure while mixing concentrated endosulfan with water and applying the solution to tobacco with boom sprayers pulled by tractors. Conclusions Estimates of the absorbed dose of endosulfan were not available because methods to determine actual personal exposure that would be found in fat or tissue samples were not used. Health and safety issues associated with endosulfan require a closer examination. A cooperative multi‐disciplinary approach to providing timely accurate education is needed to prevent pesticide poisonings. Am. J. Ind. Med. 39:643–649, 2001. © 2001 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.