z-logo
Premium
Evaluation of Mexican American migrant farmworker work practices and organochlorine pesticide metabolites
Author(s) -
HernándezValero María A.,
Bondy Melissa L.,
Spitz Margaret R.,
Zahm Shelia H.
Publication year - 2001
Publication title -
american journal of industrial medicine
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.7
H-Index - 104
eISSN - 1097-0274
pISSN - 0271-3586
DOI - 10.1002/ajim.10008
Subject(s) - medicine , environmental health , occupational exposure , pesticide , hygiene , exposure assessment , occupational medicine , occupational safety and health , organochlorine pesticide , personal protective equipment , toxicology , pathology , disease , covid-19 , infectious disease (medical specialty) , agronomy , biology
Abstract Background Epidemiologic studies often must rely upon questionnaire data to assess past exposures. The ability of questionnaires to rank migrant farmworkers according to past pesticide exposure is not known. Methods We conducted a pilot feasibility study to measure a panel of 21 organochlorine pesticides (OCPs) and correlate levels with reported occupational exposures in 26 Mexican–American migrant farmworkers in Baytown, Texas. The Migrant Farmworker Questionnaire developed by the National Cancer Institute (NCI) was administered and each participant donated a blood sample. Three OCPs [mean (ppb) levels: mirex 1.8, DDT 1.0, and trans‐nonachlor 0.7] were detected despite the fact that these chemicals have been banned in the US for many years, and the detected levels were far higher than the standard provided by the referent laboratory. Work clothes, protective attire, and self‐reported pesticide exposures were significant predictors of OCP exposure. Similarly, personal hygiene, length of employment, and number of duties also predicted OCP exposure. Conclusions The results of this study indicate that data obtained from standardized questionnaires may be reasonable indicators of occupational exposure when biomarker data are not available. Am. J. Ind. Med. 40:554–560, 2001. © 2001 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.

This content is not available in your region!

Continue researching here.

Having issues? You can contact us here