Premium
The influence of physical characteristics on the resting energy expenditure of youth: A meta‐analysis
Author(s) -
Herrmann Stephen D.,
McMurray Robert G.,
Kim Youngdeok,
Willis Erik A.,
Kang Minsoo,
McCurdy Thomas
Publication year - 2016
Publication title -
american journal of human biology
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.559
H-Index - 81
eISSN - 1520-6300
pISSN - 1042-0533
DOI - 10.1002/ajhb.22944
Subject(s) - body mass index , fat free mass , resting energy expenditure , demography , medicine , basal metabolic rate , population , pooled variance , meta analysis , physical activity , fat mass , zoology , energy metabolism , biology , physical therapy , environmental health , sociology
Objective To examine the literature on resting energy expenditure (REE) of youth and determine the influence of age, sex, BMI, and body composition on REE. Methods A literature search was conducted using PubMed, BIOSIS Previews, NTIS, EMBASE, MEDLINE, and Pascal databases for studies with data on resting metabolic rate, REE, resting oxygen uptake (or VO 2 ) in healthy children, youth, or adolescents (age = 1–18 years). Over 200 publications were identified; sixty‐one publications met criteria and were included in the meta‐analyses, resulting in 142 study population estimates (totaling 5,397 youth) of REE. Results Pooled mean was 1414 kcal·day −1 with a significant and moderate‐to‐high between‐study heterogeneity [ Q (140) = 7912.42, P < 0.001; I 2 = 98.97%]. A significantly greater ( P < 0.001) pooled mean kcal·day −1 was estimated for studies with male participants (1519 kcal·day −1 ) comparing to studies with female participants (1338 kcal·day −1 ). Age, height, and body mass resulted in the highest R 2 of 86.4 for males and 83.9% for females. Fat free mass and body mass index (BMI) did not improve total R 2 . Conclusions These data suggest that using a linear equation including age, height, and body mass to estimate REE based on kcal·day −1 is more accurate than estimates based on body mass kcal·kg −1 ·h −1 . Further, if kcal·kg −1 ·h −1 is used, including a quadratic component for the physical characteristics improves the predictive ability of the equation. Regardless of the metric, separate equations should be used for each sex.