z-logo
Premium
Patterns of directional asymmetry in the pelvis and pelvic canal
Author(s) -
Tobolsky Victoria A.,
Kurki Helen K.,
Stock Jay T.
Publication year - 2016
Publication title -
american journal of human biology
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.559
H-Index - 81
eISSN - 1520-6300
pISSN - 1042-0533
DOI - 10.1002/ajhb.22870
Subject(s) - pelvis , bipedalism , anatomy , birth canal , asymmetry , medicine , biology , orthodontics , physics , pregnancy , quantum mechanics , genetics
Objectives The human pelvis is unique among modern taxa for supporting both parturition of large brained young and obligate bipedalism. Though much work has focused on pelvic development and variation, little work has explored the presence or absence of asymmetry in the pelvis despite well‐known patterns of asymmetry in other skeletal regions. This study investigated whether patterns of directional asymmetry (DA) could be observed in the pelvis or pelvic canal. Methods Seventeen bilaterally paired osteometric measurements of the os coxae (34 measures in total) were taken from 128 skeletons (female n  = 65, male n  = 63) from recent human populations in five geographic regions. Paired sample t ‐tests and Mann–Whitney U‐tests were used to investigate DA. Results Results from a pooled sample of all individuals showed that the pelvis exhibited a left‐bias in DA. In contrast, the pelvic canal exhibited a pattern in which the anterior canal exhibited a right‐bias and the posterior canal exhibited a left‐bias. Neither sex nor populational differences in DA were observed in the pelvis or pelvic canal. Conclusions The varying patterns of asymmetry uncovered here accord with prior work and may indicate that loading from the trunk and legs place differing stresses on the pelvis and canal, yielding these unequal asymmetries. However, this is speculative and the possible influence of genetics, biomechanics, and nutritional status on the development of pelvic and canal asymmetries presents a rich area for future study. Additionally, the potential influence of pelvic canal asymmetry on obstetric measures of pelvic capacity merits future research. Am. J. Hum. Biol. 28:804–810, 2016. © 2016Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

This content is not available in your region!

Continue researching here.

Having issues? You can contact us here