Premium
Phenotypic plasticity and functional asymmetry in response to grip forces exerted by intercollegiate tennis players
Author(s) -
Lucki Natasha C.,
Nicolay Christopher W.
Publication year - 2007
Publication title -
american journal of human biology
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.559
H-Index - 81
eISSN - 1520-6300
pISSN - 1042-0533
DOI - 10.1002/ajhb.20632
Subject(s) - hum , grip strength , hand strength , racket , circumference , physical medicine and rehabilitation , forearm , medicine , physical therapy , psychology , anatomy , mathematics , physics , art , geometry , performance art , swing , acoustics , art history
This study examined phenotypic and functional responses to extreme asymmetry in hand use, and recorded the grip forces that occur during the tennis serve to assess the forces that contribute to asymmetry. Compressive grip performance was measured for Division I collegiate tennis players (24 female, 24 male) and nonathlete college students (18 females, 17 males) during three experiments: single‐repetition maximum voluntary contraction, 30 consecutive repetitions, and a 30‐s static hold. Tennis players had significant asymmetry in both forearm circumference and grip strength. The dominant hand of female tennis players produced 25% more force than the opposite hand, while the difference between hands of male tennis players was 18%. However, endurance over 30‐repetitions and during the 30‐s hold did not significantly differ between the limbs of tennis players. No significant asymmetry in forearm measurements, grip strength, or endurance was detected between the limbs of nonathletes. Grip forces generated during the tennis serve were recorded for 4 male tennis players, using a racket with a dynamometer incorporated into the handle. Peak handgrip forces generated during the serve (150–250 N) averaged 31–44% of the maximum grip force of the participant. Tennis players have increased muscle mass and strength of the dominant limb. Moderate forces, occurring hundreds of times each match and practice, are likely the primary forces contributing to this morphological and functional asymmetry. Am. J. Hum. Biol. 19:566–577, 2007. © 2007 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.