Premium
Center of body mass and the evolution of female body shape
Author(s) -
Pawłowski Bogusław,
Grabarczyk Marzena
Publication year - 2003
Publication title -
american journal of human biology
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.559
H-Index - 81
eISSN - 1520-6300
pISSN - 1042-0533
DOI - 10.1002/ajhb.10136
Subject(s) - sexual dimorphism , body proportions , anthropometry , sexual selection , biology , body shape , circumference , sex characteristics , callitrichidae , waist , zoology , anatomy , body mass index , medicine , primate , ecology , endocrinology , geometry , callithrix , mathematics , pathology
Among primates, the genus Homo has a unique sexual dimorphism in general body shape. The stenotypic female “hourglass figure” has often been attributed to sexual selection. Sexual dimorphism both in shape and in position of the center of body mass (CoM) emerges during puberty and is related to hormonal influences. These are only the proximal and not the ultimate causes of this feature. This article explores the hypothesis that the evolutionary (i.e., ultimate) reason for female body shape and male preference for a lower waist‐to‐hip ratio (WHR) is due to the acquisition of bipedal locomotion and different biomechanical constraints on each sex. The demands of pregnancy and subsequently carrying infants may have more tightly constrained CoM in females than in males. A lower‐position of CoM relative to height (RCoM=(CoM/height)*100%) would contribute to better stability during pregnancy and infant carrying. Using body measurements from 119 female students, we show that RCoM correlates negatively with only maximal thigh circumference and positively with only WHR and shoulder width. The relationship between RCoM and traits that best characterize female body shape seems to confirm a hypothesis of biomechanical selection pressure that may have acted on Homo female morphology, thus contributing to sexual dimorphism. Am. J. Hum. Biol. 15:144–150, 2003. © 2003 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.