Premium
Intermediate‐dose anticoagulation, aspirin, and in‐hospital mortality in COVID ‐19: A propensity score‐matched analysis
Author(s) -
Meizlish Matthew L.,
Goshua George,
Liu Yiwen,
Fine Rebecca,
Amin Kejal,
Chang Eric,
DeFilippo Nicholas,
Keating Craig,
Liu Yuxin,
Mankbadi Michael,
McManus Dayna,
Wang Stephen Y.,
Price Christina,
Bona Robert D.,
Ochoa Chaar Cassius Iyad,
Chun Hyung J.,
Pine Alexander B.,
Rinder Henry M.,
Siner Jonathan M.,
Neuberg Donna S.,
Owusu Kent A.,
Lee Alfred Ian
Publication year - 2021
Publication title -
american journal of hematology
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 2.456
H-Index - 105
eISSN - 1096-8652
pISSN - 0361-8609
DOI - 10.1002/ajh.26102
Subject(s) - medicine , propensity score matching , aspirin , hazard ratio , cumulative incidence , proportional hazards model , retrospective cohort study , cohort , antithrombotic , cohort study , confounding , incidence (geometry) , surgery , confidence interval , physics , optics
Thrombotic complications occur at high rates in hospitalized patients with COVID‐19, yet the impact of intensive antithrombotic therapy on mortality is uncertain. We examined in‐hospital mortality with intermediate‐ compared to prophylactic‐dose anticoagulation, and separately with in‐hospital aspirin compared to no antiplatelet therapy, in a large, retrospective study of 2785 hospitalized adult COVID‐19 patients. In this analysis, we established two separate, nested cohorts of patients (a) who received intermediate‐ or prophylactic‐dose anticoagulation (“anticoagulation cohort”, N = 1624), or (b) who were not on home antiplatelet therapy and received either in‐hospital aspirin or no antiplatelet therapy (“aspirin cohort”, N = 1956). To minimize bias and adjust for confounding factors, we incorporated propensity score matching and multivariable regression utilizing various markers of illness severity and other patient‐specific covariates, yielding treatment groups with well‐balanced covariates in each cohort. The primary outcome was cumulative incidence of in‐hospital death. Among propensity score‐matched patients in the anticoagulation cohort (N = 382), in a multivariable regression model, intermediate‐ compared to prophylactic‐dose anticoagulation was associated with a significantly lower cumulative incidence of in‐hospital death (hazard ratio 0.518 [0.308–0.872]). Among propensity‐score matched patients in the aspirin cohort (N = 638), in a multivariable regression model, in‐hospital aspirin compared to no antiplatelet therapy was associated with a significantly lower cumulative incidence of in‐hospital death (hazard ratio 0.522 [0.336–0.812]). In this propensity score‐matched, observational study of COVID‐19, intermediate‐dose anticoagulation and aspirin were each associated with a lower cumulative incidence of in‐hospital death.