z-logo
Premium
Peripheral blood blast clearance is an independent prognostic factor for survival and response to acute myeloid leukemia induction chemotherapy
Author(s) -
Short Nicholas J.,
Benton Christopher B.,
Chen HsiangChun,
Qiu Peng,
Gu Lisa,
Pierce Sherry,
Brandt Mark,
Maiti Abhishek,
Min Taejin L.,
Naqvi Kiran,
QuintasCardama Alfonso,
Konopleva Marina,
Kadia Tapan,
Cortes Jorge,
GarciaManero Guillermo,
Ravandi Farhad,
Jabbour Elias,
Kantarjian Hagop,
Andreeff Michael
Publication year - 2016
Publication title -
american journal of hematology
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 2.456
H-Index - 105
eISSN - 1096-8652
pISSN - 0361-8609
DOI - 10.1002/ajh.24500
Subject(s) - medicine , induction chemotherapy , chemotherapy , myeloid leukemia , gastroenterology , oncology , cytarabine , retrospective cohort study , risk factor , myeloid , surgery , immunology
In patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML), rapid reduction of circulating blasts with induction chemotherapy may serve as an in vivo marker of chemosensitivity. We performed a retrospective analysis of 363 patients with untreated AML who received induction chemotherapy in order to determine the relationship between day of blast disappearance (DOBD) and complete remission (CR) rates, event‐free survival (EFS), and overall survival (OS). DOBD ≤ 5 vs. >5 was identified as the most discriminating cutoff for OS. DOBD > 5 was observed in 35 patients (9.6%). The CR rate for patients with DOBD ≤ 5 vs. >5 was 74.0 and 28.6%, median EFS was 9.4 and 1.8 months, and median OS was 17.1 and 5.8 months, respectively ( P  < 0.001 for all). DOBD > 5 was independently associated with a lower CR rate and shorter EFS and OS ( P  < 0.001 for all). DOBD > 5 retained prognostic significance for EFS and OS when patients were stratified by cytogenetic risk group, de novo vs. secondary or therapy‐related AML, European LeukemiaNet‐based risk groups, and whether CR was achieved. We propose DOBD > 5 as a simple and early marker of disease resistance that identifies patients with poor prognosis who otherwise may not be identified with existing risk stratification systems. Am. J. Hematol. 91:1221–1226, 2016. © 2016 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

This content is not available in your region!

Continue researching here.

Having issues? You can contact us here