Premium
G‐CSF P riming, clofarabine, and high dose cytarabine (GCLAC) for upfront treatment of acute myeloid leukemia, advanced myelodysplastic syndrome or advanced myeloproliferative neoplasm
Author(s) -
Becker Pamela S.,
Medeiros Bruno C.,
Stein Anthony S.,
Othus Megan,
Appelbaum Frederick R.,
Forman Stephen J.,
Scott Bart L.,
Hendrie Paul C.,
Gardner Kelda M.,
Pagel John M.,
Walter Roland B.,
Parks Cynthia,
Wood Brent L.,
Abkowitz Janis L.,
Estey Elihu H.
Publication year - 2015
Publication title -
american journal of hematology
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 2.456
H-Index - 105
eISSN - 1096-8652
pISSN - 0361-8609
DOI - 10.1002/ajh.23927
Subject(s) - clofarabine , cytarabine , medicine , fludarabine , gastroenterology , myelodysplastic syndromes , myeloid leukemia , regimen , myeloproliferative neoplasm , granulocyte colony stimulating factor , leukemia , oncology , surgery , chemotherapy , bone marrow , cyclophosphamide , myelofibrosis
Prior study of the combination of clofarabine and high dose cytarabine with granulocyte colony‐stimulating factor (G‐CSF) priming (GCLAC) in relapsed or refractory acute myeloid leukemia resulted in a 46% rate of complete remission despite unfavorable risk cytogenetics. A multivariate analysis demonstrated that the remission rate and survival with GCLAC were superior to FLAG (fludarabine, cytarabine, G‐CSF) in the relapsed setting. We therefore initiated a study of the GCLAC regimen in the upfront setting in a multicenter trial. The objectives were to evaluate the rates of complete remission (CR), overall and relapse‐free survival (OS and RFS), and toxicity of GCLAC. Clofarabine was administered at 30 mg m −2 day −1 × 5 and cytarabine at 2 g m −2 day −1 × 5 after G‐CSF priming in 50 newly‐diagnosed patients ages 18–64 with AML or advanced myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS) or advanced myeloproliferative neoplasm (MPN). Responses were assessed in the different cytogenetic risk groups and in patients with antecedent hematologic disorder. The overall CR rate was 76% (95% confidence interval [CI] 64–88%) and the CR + CRp (CR with incomplete platelet count recovery) was 82% (95% CI 71–93%). The CR rate was 100% for patients with favorable, 84% for those with intermediate, and 62% for those with unfavorable risk cytogenetics. For patients with an antecedent hematologic disorder (AHD), the CR rate was 65%, compared to 85% for those without an AHD. The 60 day mortality was 2%. Thus, front line GCLAC is a well‐tolerated, effective induction regimen for AML and advanced myelodysplastic or myeloproliferative disorders. Am. J. Hematol. 90:295–300, 2015. © 2014 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.