z-logo
open-access-imgOpen Access
Evaluation of factors associated with en bloc colonic underwater endoscopic mucosal resection
Author(s) -
Chen ChienAn,
Ho ChungHan,
Hsieh PingHsin
Publication year - 2021
Publication title -
advances in digestive medicine
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
ISSN - 2351-9800
DOI - 10.1002/aid2.13207
Subject(s) - medicine , endoscopic mucosal resection , gastroenterology , resection , surgery
Underwater endoscopic mucosal resection (UEMR) is a relatively simple and safe method for resecting sessile colorectal polyps without a submucosal injection. Only around 1000 UEMRs have been reported in a few studies, and none of the previous studies directly evaluated the factors associated with a successful en bloc resection. We retrospectively evaluated the factors associated with a successful en bloc resection using UEMR from 160 patients between August 2015 and November 2017. Of 173 polyps removed with UEMR, 141 polyps (81.5%) were removed en bloc. Univariable analysis showed that polyp size ≥20 mm (OR: 0.047, 95% CI: 0.014‐0.162, P  < .001), prior treatment (OR: 0.297, 95% CI: 0.135‐0.655, P  = .003), and polyp morphology (flat vs sessile) (OR: 0.111, 95% CI: 0.025‐0.482, P  = .003) were the significant factors for en bloc resection. Multivariate analysis showed that polyp size ≥20 mm (OR: 0.053, 95% CI: 0.015‐0.194, P  < .001), prior treatment (OR: 0.313, 95% CI: 0.118‐0.832, P  = .020), and polyp morphology (flat vs sessile) (OR: 0.095, 95% CI: 0.019‐0.469, P  = .004) were still significant. The rate of adverse events was 3.5% ( n  = 6) and included delayed hemorrhages ( n  = 2, 1.2%), muscle defects requiring endoscopic clipping ( n  = 3, 1.7%), and delayed perforations ( n  = 1, 0.6%). Polyp size < 20 mm, without prior treatment, and sessile polyp morphology were significantly associated with en bloc UEMR.

The content you want is available to Zendy users.

Already have an account? Click here to sign in.
Having issues? You can contact us here