z-logo
Premium
Nanofiltration thin‐film composite membrane on either the internal or the external surface of a polysulfone hollow fiber
Author(s) -
EchaideGórriz Carlos,
Malankowska Magdalena,
Téllez Carlos,
Coronas Joaquín
Publication year - 2020
Publication title -
aiche journal
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.958
H-Index - 167
eISSN - 1547-5905
pISSN - 0001-1541
DOI - 10.1002/aic.16970
Subject(s) - nanofiltration , polysulfone , permeance , membrane , materials science , thin film composite membrane , interfacial polymerization , polyamide , composite material , multiphysics , surface roughness , porosity , fiber , composite number , chemical engineering , hollow fiber membrane , polymer , chemistry , permeation , reverse osmosis , finite element method , monomer , biochemistry , engineering , physics , thermodynamics
The inner and outer surfaces of a porous hollow fiber polysulfone support are compared as substrates for the synthesis of polyamide thin‐film composite (TFC) membranes by interfacial polymerization. While both surfaces have pores common of microfiltration membranes, the inner surface has a larger pore diameter than the outer surface (2,700 nm compared to 950 nm). The inner TFC membrane showed higher water nanofiltration permeance than the outer (2.20 ± 0.17 compared to 0.13 ± 0.03 L m −2 hr −1 bar −1 ). This was due to the influence of the porosity and roughness, which were different on both support surfaces. These membranes are interesting because they were synthesized in a hollow fiber support with a high membrane area per volume unit (~6,900 m 2 /m 3 ) and the substrate used was commercial, which means that the TFC membrane obtained is suitable for industrial application. A mathematical simulation of the nanofiltration run with COMSOL Multiphysics 5.3 software confirmed the experimental trends observed.

This content is not available in your region!

Continue researching here.

Having issues? You can contact us here