z-logo
Premium
Accuracy and optimal sampling in M onte C arlo solution of population balance equations
Author(s) -
Yu Xi,
Hounslow Michael J,
Reynolds Gavin K
Publication year - 2015
Publication title -
aiche journal
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.958
H-Index - 167
eISSN - 1547-5905
pISSN - 0001-1541
DOI - 10.1002/aic.14837
Subject(s) - monte carlo method , hellinger distance , mathematics , weighting , population , sample size determination , statistics , replicate , coalescence (physics) , mathematical optimization , algorithm , combinatorics , physics , demography , sociology , acoustics , astrobiology
Implementation of a Monte Carlo simulation for the solution of population balance equations (PBEs) requires choice of initial sample number (N 0 ), number of replicates (M), and number of bins for probability distribution reconstruction (n). It is found that Squared Hellinger Distance, H 2 , is a useful measurement of the accuracy of Monte Carlo (MC) simulation, and can be related directly to N 0 , M, and n. Asymptotic approximations of H 2 are deduced and tested for both one‐dimensional (1‐D) and 2‐D PBEs with coalescence. The central processing unit (CPU) cost, C, is found in a power‐law relationship, C = a M N 0 b , with the CPU cost index, b, indicating the weighting of N 0 in the total CPU cost. n must be chosen to balance accuracy and resolution. For fixed n, M × N 0 determines the accuracy of MC prediction; if b > 1, then the optimal solution strategy uses multiple replications and small sample size. Conversely, if 0 < b < 1, one replicate and a large initial sample size is preferred. © 2015 American Institute of Chemical Engineers AIChE J , 61: 2394–2402, 2015

This content is not available in your region!

Continue researching here.

Having issues? You can contact us here
Accelerating Research

Address

John Eccles House
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom