Premium
Chemical‐looping combustion process: Kinetics and mathematical modeling
Author(s) -
Iliuta Ion,
Tahoces Raul,
Patience Gregory S.,
Rifflart Sebastien,
Luck Francis
Publication year - 2010
Publication title -
aiche journal
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.958
H-Index - 167
eISSN - 1547-5905
pISSN - 0001-1541
DOI - 10.1002/aic.11967
Subject(s) - chemical looping combustion , methane , microreactor , chemistry , methanation , fluidized bed , anaerobic oxidation of methane , oxygen , supercritical fluid , syngas , combustion , propane , chemical engineering , catalysis , organic chemistry , engineering
Chemical Looping Combustion technology involves circulating a metal oxide between a fuel zone where methane reacts under anaerobic conditions to produce a concentrated stream of CO 2 and water and an oxygen rich environment where the metal is reoxidized. Although the needs for electrical power generation drive the process to high temperatures, lower temperatures (600–800°C) are sufficient for industrial processes such as refineries. In this paper, we investigate the transient kinetics of NiO carriers in the temperature range of 600 to 900°C in both a fixed bed microreactor (WHSV = 2‐4 g CH 4 /h/g oxygen carrier) and a fluid bed reactor (WHSV = 0.014‐0.14 g CH 4 /h per g oxygen carrier). Complete methane conversion is achieved in the fluid bed for several minutes. In the microreactor, the methane conversion reaches a maximum after an initial induction period of less than 10 s. Both CO 2 and H 2 O yields are highest during this induction period. As the oxygen is consumed, methane conversion drops and both CO and H 2 yields increase, whereas the CO 2 and H 2 O concentrations decrease. The kinetics parameter of the gas–solids reactions (reduction of NiO with CH 4 , H 2 , and CO) together with catalytic reactions (methane reforming, methanation, shift, and gasification) were estimated using experimental data obtained on the fixed bed microreactor. Then, the kinetic expressions were combined with a detailed hydrodynamic model to successfully simulate the comportment of the fluidized bed reactor. © 2010 American Institute of Chemical Engineers AIChE J, 2010