Premium
A promising method for electrodeposition of aluminium on stainless steel in ionic liquid
Author(s) -
Yue Guikuan,
Zhang Suojiang,
Zhu Yanli,
Lu Xingmei,
Li Shucai,
Li Zengxi
Publication year - 2009
Publication title -
aiche journal
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.958
H-Index - 167
eISSN - 1547-5905
pISSN - 0001-1541
DOI - 10.1002/aic.11698
Subject(s) - ionic liquid , nucleation , aluminium , electrolyte , materials science , current density , chloride , electrolysis , deposition (geology) , microstructure , analytical chemistry (journal) , chemical engineering , inorganic chemistry , chemistry , metallurgy , organic chemistry , catalysis , electrode , paleontology , physics , quantum mechanics , sediment , engineering , biology
A promising method for aluminium deposition was proposed by using AlCl 3 /[bmim]Cl (1‐butyl‐3‐methylimidazolium chloride) ionic liquid as electrolyte. By using this novel method, the volatile and flammable organic solvent systems and the high corrosive inorganic molten salts with high temperature can be substituted, and the deposit microstructure can be easily adjusted by changing the current density, temperature and electrolyte composition. The study was performed by means of galvano‐static electrolysis and the optimum operating conditions were determined based on the systematic studies of the effects of current density, temperature, molar ratio of AlCl 3 to [bmim]Cl, stirring speed and deposition time on the quality of deposited coatings. The electrical conductivities of electrolytes were also investigated as a function of temperature (298–358 K) and molar ratio of AlCl 3 to [bmim]Cl (from 0.1:1 to 2.0:1). Dense, bright and adherent aluminium coatings were obtained over a wide range of temperature (298–348 K), current densities (8–44 mA/cm 2 ) and molar ratio (1.6:1–2.0:1). Results from the analysis of crystal structure show that all of the electrodeposits exhibit a preferred (200) crystallographic orientation. Temperature has significant influence on the crystallographic orientation and there does not appear to be an apparent impact of current density on it. Analyses of the chronoamperograms indicate that the deposition process of aluminium on stainless steel was controlled by three‐dimension nucleation with diffusion‐controlled growth and there is a conversion from progressive nucleation to instantaneous nucleation. © 2009 American Institute of Chemical Engineers AIChE J, 2009