z-logo
open-access-imgOpen Access
Long‐term outcomes of laparoscopic versus open liver resection for intrahepatic combined hepatocellular‐cholangiocarcinoma with propensity score matching
Author(s) -
Lee Seung Jae,
Kang So Hyun,
Choi YoungRok,
Lee Boram,
Hong Suk Kyun,
Cho Jai Young,
Yi NamJoon,
Lee KwangWoong,
Suh KyungSuk,
Han HoSeong
Publication year - 2022
Publication title -
annals of gastroenterological surgery
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.308
H-Index - 15
ISSN - 2475-0328
DOI - 10.1002/ags3.12555
Subject(s) - propensity score matching , medicine , confounding , hepatectomy , surgery , retrospective cohort study , intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma , gastroenterology , liver disease , cohort , resection
Background Combined hepatocellular‐cholangiocarcinoma (cHCC‐CCA) is a rare primary hepatic neoplasm. Currently, there are no well‐structured studies that analyze the feasibility of laparoscopic liver resection in cHCC‐CCA alone. This retrospective cohort study aimed to compare the long‐term survival of laparoscopic liver resection with open liver resection in cHCC‐CCA. Methods Patients with a postoperative pathologic report of cHCC‐CCA who underwent liver resection from August 2004 to December 2017 were included in this study. Kaplan–Meier survival analysis was performed to analyze the 3‐y disease‐free survival and 3‐y overall survival. Propensity score matching was done to reduce the influence of confounding variables. Results A total of 145 patients were pathologically confirmed to have cHCC‐CCA, of which 10 patients were excluded due to having received palliative surgery. Of the remaining 135 patients, 43 underwent laparoscopic and 92 underwent open liver resection; propensity score matching yielded 30 patients for each group. The 3‐y overall survival was 38 (88.4%) in the laparoscopic group and 84 (91.3%) in the open group before propensity score matching ( P  = .678), and 25 (83.3%) and 28 (93.3%), respectively, after matching ( P  = .257). The 3‐y disease‐free survival was 24 (55.8%) in the laparoscopic group and 32 (34.8%) in the open group before matching ( P  = .040), and 17 (56.7%) and 16 (53.3%), respectively, after matching ( P  = .958). The hospital stay was shorter in the laparoscopic group before and after matching, while other operative outcomes were similar in both groups. Conclusion Laparoscopic liver resection for cHCC‐CCA is technically feasible and safe, having a shorter hospital stay without compromising oncological outcomes.

The content you want is available to Zendy users.

Already have an account? Click here to sign in.
Having issues? You can contact us here