Open AccessDislocation of the gastric conduit reconstructed via the posterior mediastinal route is a significant risk factor for anastomotic disorder after McKeown esophagectomy
Author(s) -
Nakajima Masanobu,
Muroi Hiroto,
Kikuchi Maiko,
Fujita Junki,
Ihara Keisuke,
Nakagawa Masatoshi,
Morita Shinji,
Nakamura Takatoshi,
Yamaguchi Satoru,
Kojima Kazuyuki
Publication year - 2022
Publication title -
annals of gastroenterological surgery
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.308
H-Index - 15
ISSN - 2475-0328
DOI - 10.1002/ags3.12496
Subject(s) - medicine , anastomosis , esophagectomy , body mass index , odds ratio , surgery , confidence interval , risk factor , gastroenterology , esophageal cancer , cancer
Background Anastomotic disorder of the reconstructed gastric conduit is a life‐threating morbidity after thoracic esophagectomy. Although there are various reasons for anastomotic disorder, the present study focused on dislocation of the gastric conduit (DGC). Methods The study cohort comprised 149 patients who underwent transthoracic esophagectomy. The relationships between DGC and peri‐ and postoperative morbidities were analyzed retrospectively. Data were analyzed to determine whether body mass index (BMI) and extension of the gastric conduit were related to DGC. Uni‐ and multivariate Cox regression analyses were performed to identify the factors associated with anastomotic disorder. Results DGC was significantly related to anastomotic leakage ( P < .001), anastomotic stricture ( P = .018), and mediastinal abscess/empyema ( P = .031). Compared with the DGC‐negative group, the DGC‐positive group had a significantly larger mean preoperative BMI (23.01 ± 3.26 kg/m 2 vs. 21.22 ± 3.13 kg/m 2 , P = .001) and mean maximum cross‐sectional area of the gastric conduit (1024.75 ± 550.43 mm 2 vs. 619.46 ± 263.70 mm 2 , P < .001). Multivariate analysis revealed that DGC was an independent risk factor for anastomotic leakage (odds ratio: 4.840, 95% confidence interval: 1.770‐13.30, P < .001). Body weight recovery tended to be better in the DGC‐negative group than in the DGC‐positive group, although this intergroup difference was not significant. Conclusion DGC reconstructed via the posterior mediastinal route is a significant cause of critical morbidities related to anastomosis. In particular, care is required when performing gastric conduit reconstruction via the posterior mediastinal route in patients with a high BMI.