Open AccessMinimally invasive surgery is feasible after preoperative chemotherapy for stage IV gastric cancer
Author(s) -
Yamamoto Kazuyoshi,
Omori Takeshi,
Hara Hisashi,
Shinno Naoki,
Sugimura Keijiro,
Miyata Hiroshi,
Takahashi Hidenori,
Fujiwara Yoshiyuki,
Ohue Masayuki,
Yano Masahiko
Publication year - 2020
Publication title -
annals of gastroenterological surgery
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.308
H-Index - 15
ISSN - 2475-0328
DOI - 10.1002/ags3.12343
Subject(s) - medicine , hazard ratio , surgery , chemotherapy , stage (stratigraphy) , confidence interval , cancer , incidence (geometry) , metastasis , gastroenterology , paleontology , physics , optics , biology
Aim To elucidate the safety and feasibility of minimally invasive surgery (MIS) as conversion surgery after chemotherapy for stage IV gastric cancer, we compared the background characteristics and clinical courses of patients who underwent open conversion surgery (open group) versus MIS (MIS group). Methods We included 94 consecutive patients with stage IV gastric cancer who received chemotherapy followed by conversion surgery gastric resection from January 2011 to October 2019 at the Osaka International Cancer Institute in this analysis. Results The open group included more patients who had macroscopic peritoneal metastasis and required splenectomy. However, other background characteristics, including preoperative chemotherapy duration, were comparable. The MIS group had significantly longer operative time (266 vs 339 minutes, P = .0039) and less operative blood loss (520 vs 10 mL, P < .0001). The incidence of postoperative complication of Clavien‐Dindo grade II or higher was non‐significantly lower (24.5% vs 9.8%, P = .058) and length of postoperative hospital stay was significantly shorter in the MIS group (12 vs 8 days, P < .0001). Even though the open group included more patients with more advanced (ypT4a or higher, or N3) disease, the MIS group had better recurrence free survival and overall survival (OS). Multivariate analysis revealed that N status (hazard ratio [HR], 4.39; 95% confidence interval [CI], 2.18‐12.26; P < .0001) and T status (2.11; 1.05‐4.36; P = .036) were independent prognostic factors for OS. MIS was not a negative prognostic factor for OS (HR, 0.44; 95% CI, 0.15‐1.10; P = .081). Conclusion MIS can be safely performed as conversion surgery following chemotherapy for stage IV gastric cancer.