Premium
Beef quality assurance schemes: Can they improve farm economic performance?
Author(s) -
Tsakiridis Andreas,
Wallace Michael,
Breen James,
O'Donoghue Cathal,
Hanrahan Kevin
Publication year - 2020
Publication title -
agribusiness
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.57
H-Index - 43
eISSN - 1520-6297
pISSN - 0742-4477
DOI - 10.1002/agr.21689
Subject(s) - quality assurance , incentive , econlit , business , beef industry , quality (philosophy) , agricultural science , beef cattle , agricultural economics , environmental economics , marketing , economics , environmental science , philosophy , medline , epistemology , political science , law , microeconomics , service (business) , biology , genetics
Abstract Beef quality assurance initiatives have been developed to assure consumers of the quality and safety of supplied beef, as well as the environmental‐orientation of farm production practices. However, the potential economic benefits of quality schemes to European beef cattle farmers have been overlooked. This paper uses farm‐level data to identify the drivers of Irish farmers’ participation in Bord Bia's Beef and Lamb Quality Assurance Scheme (BLQAS) in 2012, and assesses the impact of participation on farm gross margins. After controlling for potential self‐selection bias, we cannot find reliable evidence that the gross margins of participants in beef quality assurance schemes have been affected by their decision to participate. Consequently, lack of financial incentives can be a barrier to farmer participation in beef quality assurance schemes [EconLit citations: L25, M21, Q12].