Premium
Voluntary food labeling: The additive effect of “free from” labels and region of origin
Author(s) -
Grebitus Carola,
Peschel Anne O.,
Hughner Renée Shaw
Publication year - 2018
Publication title -
agribusiness
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.57
H-Index - 43
eISSN - 1520-6297
pISSN - 0742-4477
DOI - 10.1002/agr.21558
Subject(s) - econlit , subadditivity , food labeling , production (economics) , agricultural science , product (mathematics) , business , agricultural economics , economics , biology , food science , mathematics , microeconomics , biochemistry , geometry , medline , discrete mathematics
This study analyzes the effect of voluntary food labeling, with focus on genetically modified organisms (GMO), pesticide usage, and region of origin. We focus on Medjool dates because though U.S. production of this crop has rapidly grown in recent years, no research exists related to consumers’ preferences and WTP for this crop. We conducted online choice experiments with a sample of over 1,400 consumers from the U.S. to determine WTP for production and region of origin labeling accounting for simultaneous versus individual labeling. Results indicate consumers prefer dates grown in Arizona over dates not labeled for region of origin. Also, pesticide‐free and GMO‐free dates are preferred, with pesticide‐free having a larger impact on choices. Furthermore, accounting for interactions between these two labels reveals that they can be considered subadditive in that labeling the product with both designations reduces WTP relative to “pesticide‐free” labeling only. [EconLit citations: M31, Q13]