z-logo
Premium
Profit‐maximizing potassium fertilizer recommendations for soybean
Author(s) -
Popp Michael P.,
Slaton Nathan A.,
Roberts Trenton L.
Publication year - 2020
Publication title -
agronomy journal
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.752
H-Index - 131
eISSN - 1435-0645
pISSN - 0002-1962
DOI - 10.1002/agj2.20424
Subject(s) - fertilizer , potash , profit (economics) , mathematics , agronomy , yield (engineering) , potassium , environmental science , economics , chemistry , biology , physics , microeconomics , organic chemistry , thermodynamics
Potassium (K) fertilizer has important yield and cost ramifications in soybean [ Glycine max (L.) Merr.] production. Rate recommendations are often based on expected yield response as predicted by a soil test. To that end, soybean response to K application rate studies were analyzed using 86 site‐years from 2004 to 2019. We estimated a generic yield response curve across soybean cultivar and soil texture to allow calculation of profit‐maximizing K rates for producers in the mid‐southern United States that also consider crop value and fertilizer cost. Further, we compared profit‐maximizing fertilizer‐K rates with those currently recommended. Using a spreadsheet‐based decision aid, soybean prices and yields, fertilizer‐K cost, and a range of initial soil‐test K (STK) values, as observed over the last 10 yr, we find that current uniform fertilizer‐K rate recommendations were greater than the predicted profit‐maximizing rates. Profit‐maximizing rates added profit ranging from US$2.32 ha −1 at initial Mehlich‐3 K availability values of 110 mg K kg −1 to US$29.35 ha −1 at 60 mg K kg −1 on average. The corresponding fertilizer‐K rate reductions were 11 and 48 kg K ha −1 , respectively, resulting in attendant yield penalties of only 28 and 52 kg ha −1 . Furthermore, K fertilization was not economically justifiable beyond STK of 128 mg K kg −1 on average. Hence, performing soil tests and calculating profit‐maximizing fertilizer‐K rates showed promising returns to producers at lesser fertilizer‐K use by sacrificing a minimal amount of yield. Also, variable‐rate applied K fertilizer in comparison to uniform rate application was rarely cost effective within the tested assumptions.

This content is not available in your region!

Continue researching here.

Having issues? You can contact us here