Open AccessValue of composite Normalized Difference Vegetative Index and growing degree days data in Oklahoma, 1999 to 2018
Author(s) -
Figueiredo Bruno,
Dhillon Jagmandeep,
Eickhoff Elizabeth,
Nambi Eva,
Raun William
Publication year - 2020
Publication title -
agrosystems, geosciences and environment
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
ISSN - 2639-6696
DOI - 10.1002/agg2.20013
Subject(s) - growing degree day , normalized difference vegetation index , growing season , yield (engineering) , composite index , statistics , mathematics , agriculture , environmental science , sowing , range (aeronautics) , remote sensing , physical geography , geography , agronomy , econometrics , leaf area index , biology , engineering , materials science , composite indicator , archaeology , aerospace engineering , metallurgy
For over 25 yr, sensor‐based Normalized Difference Vegetative Index (NDVI) data has been collected from both satellite imagery and near‐plant (3‐m) readings. Because calibrated NDVI data coming from active sensors is still relatively new, limited research has returned to evaluate databases including multiple years and environments. Composite NDVI readings and final grain yield were collected from 1999 to 2018. This included growing degree day (GDD) records for each mid‐season sensor measurement. This was attempted to potentially improve the use of a historical and subjective morphological scale. Using location‐specific‐archived‐data from the Oklahoma Mesonet, the exact number of days from planting to sensing where GDD > 0 for each date and location were compiled. The ensuing relationship between NDVI (for a predetermined GDD > 0 range) and yield was determined. Grain yield prediction was improved between 80 and 115 GDDs. These ranges further targeted a climatologically identifiable metric that precisely determined when to collect sensor readings in future years. Compared with the current composite yield prediction equation for Oklahoma, the new exponential function created from this study was higher in the lower‐yielding environments. Underestimation of fertilizer N rates has been voiced by producers in recent years. This has likely been the product of more current varieties, more efficient farming practices, and increased optimum N rates needed for higher yields. This validates the adoption of a new YP0 equation for OSU's on‐line Sensor Based Nitrogen Rate Calculator, allowing accurate yield prediction between 80 and 115 GDDs.