Premium
Medical students are accurate in interpreting the presence of pathologic interstitial edema on focused lung ultrasound compared to expert reviewers
Author(s) -
Risler Zachary,
Au Arthur,
Sanjeevan Irina,
Chang Anna Marie,
Davis Elizabeth,
Nauheim Jennifer,
Sibeck Lauren,
Rankin Nicholas,
Fields Jason M.
Publication year - 2021
Publication title -
aem education and training
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.49
H-Index - 9
ISSN - 2472-5390
DOI - 10.1002/aet2.10584
Subject(s) - medicine , lung ultrasound , ultrasound , intraclass correlation , lung , radiology , confidence interval , psychometrics , clinical psychology
Abstract Background Over the past two decades, studies have demonstrated that lung ultrasound is useful in diagnosing alveolar interstitial syndrome, which is seen in patients with decompensated congestive heart failure (CHF). Methods We studied medical students performing lung ultrasound on patients admitted to the hospital with a presumed diagnosis of decompensated CHF in a prospective convenience observation study. Two ultrasound fellowship–trained emergency medicine attendings independently reviewed the lung ultrasounds at a later date, blinded to the students’ interpretation and other clinical information, to confirm ultrasound findings and assess for inter‐rater reliability of the lung ultrasound using intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs). Results Thirty‐six patients were enrolled in the study resulting in 653 unique lung zones scanned. The zones were imaged and classified as being normal (B‐lines < 3) or pathologic (B‐lines ≥ 3). The novice scanners’ interpretation was compared to expert reviews using ICCs. The ICC was 0.88, with a 95% confidence interval of 0.87 to 0.90, for all lung zones scanned. Conclusion There was almost perfect agreement between novice practitioners and experts when determining the presence of pathologic B‐lines in individual patients.