Premium
The Implementation of a Collaborative Pediatric Telesimulation Intervention in Rural Critical Access Hospitals
Author(s) -
Auerbach Marc,
Patterson Mary,
Mills William A,
Katznelson Jessica
Publication year - 2021
Publication title -
aem education and training
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.49
H-Index - 9
ISSN - 2472-5390
DOI - 10.1002/aet2.10558
Subject(s) - facilitator , session (web analytics) , intervention (counseling) , curriculum , medical education , medicine , preparedness , medical emergency , nursing , psychology , computer science , pedagogy , social psychology , world wide web , political science , law
Abstract Background Over 5.8 million pediatric visits to rural emergency department (EDs) occur each year in the United States. Most rural EDs care for less than five pediatric patients per day and are not well prepared for pediatrics. Simulation has been associated with improvements in pediatric preparedness. The implementation of pediatric simulation in rural settings is challenging due to limited access to equipment and pediatric specialists. Telesimulation involves a remote facilitator interacting with onsite learners. This article aims to describe the implementation experiences and participant feedback of a 1‐year remotely facilitated pediatric emergency telesimulation program in three critical‐access hospitals. Methods Three hospitals were recruited to participate with a nurse manager serving as the on‐site lead. The managers worked with a study investigator to set up the simulation technology during an in‐person pilot testing visit with the off‐site facilitators. A curriculum consisting of eight pediatric telesimulations and debriefings was conducted over a 12‐month period. Participant feedback was collected via a paper survey after each simulation. Implementation metrics were collected after each session including technical and logistic issues. Results Of 147 participant feedback surveys 90% reported that pediatric simulations should be conducted on a regular basis and overall feedback was positive. Forty‐seven of 48 simulations were completed on the first attempt with few major technologic issues. The most common issue encountered related to the simulator not working correctly locally and involved the facilitator running the session without the heart and lung sounds. All debriefings occurred without any issues. Conclusions This replicable telesimulation program can be used in the small, rural hospital setting, overcoming time and distance barriers and lending pediatric emergency medicine expertise to the education of critical‐access hospital providers.