z-logo
Premium
Emergency Medicine Morbidity and Mortality Conference and Culture of Safety: The Resident Perspective
Author(s) -
Wittels Kathleen,
Aaronson Emily,
Dwyer Richard,
Nadel Eric,
Gallahue Fiona,
Fee Christopher,
Tubbs Robert,
Schuur Jeremiah
Publication year - 2017
Publication title -
aem education and training
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.49
H-Index - 9
ISSN - 2472-5390
DOI - 10.1002/aet2.10033
Subject(s) - medicine , accreditation , graduate medical education , debriefing , family medicine , patient safety , emergency medicine , health care , medical education , political science , law
Objective Morbidity and mortality conference (M&M) is common in emergency medicine ( EM ) and an Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education ( ACGME ) requirement. We aimed to characterize the prevalence of elements of EM M&M conferences that foster a strong culture of safety. Methods Emergency medicine residents at 33 programs across the United States were surveyed using questions adapted from a previously tested survey of EM program directors and the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality ( AHRQ ) Culture of Safety Survey. Results The survey response rate was 80.3% (1,002/1,248). A total of 60.3% (601/997) of residents had not submitted a case of theirs to M&M in the past year. A total of 7.6% (73/954) reported that issues raised at M&M always led to change while 88.3% (842/954) reported that they sometimes did and 4.1% (39/954) reported that they never did. A total of 56.2% (536/954) responded that changes made due to M&M were reported back to the residents. Of residents who had cases presented at M&M, 24.2% (130/538) responded that there was regular debriefing, 65.2% (351/538) responded that there was not, and 10.6% (57/578) were unsure. A total of 10.2% (101/988) of respondents agreed that M&M was punitive, 17.4% were neutral (172/988), and 72.4% (715/988) disagreed. A total of 18.0% (178/987) of residents agreed that they felt pressure to order unnecessary tests because of M&M, 22.3% (220/987) were neutral, and 59.6% (589/987) disagreed. A total of 87.4% (862/986) felt that M&M was a valuable educational didactic session, and 78.3% (766/978) believed that M&M contributes to a culture of safety in their institution. Conclusions While most residents believe that M&M is a valuable didactic session and contributes to institutional culture of safety, there are opportunities to improve by communicating changes made in response to M&M, debriefing residents who have had cases presented, and taking steps to make M&M not feel punitive to some residents.

This content is not available in your region!

Continue researching here.

Having issues? You can contact us here
Accelerating Research

Address

John Eccles House
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom