Premium
Exploring Polarization in US Food Policy Opinions
Author(s) -
Biedny Christina,
Malone Trey,
Lusk Jayson L.
Publication year - 2020
Publication title -
applied economic perspectives and policy
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.4
H-Index - 49
eISSN - 2040-5804
pISSN - 2040-5790
DOI - 10.1002/aepp.13053
Subject(s) - food policy , politics , polarization (electrochemistry) , public policy , public economics , political science , government (linguistics) , economic interventionism , public opinion , preference , intervention (counseling) , welfare , economics , variance (accounting) , agriculture , political economy , food security , psychology , law , ecology , linguistics , chemistry , philosophy , psychiatry , microeconomics , biology , accounting
Many maintain that the US political climate has become more charged with partisan beliefs over the past decade, although little is known about whether this partisan divide can be observed in food policy opinions. This article aims to determine whether Democrat and Republican food policy opinions diverged between 2011 and 2018. We find evidence of the contrary; partisan public opinions on food and agriculture policies have actually converged, with both major parties exhibiting a preference toward heightened government intervention. Our results indicate that voters preferring more government intervention in food policies have become more numerous in the Republican Party for issues including animal welfare and affordable food. However, once we include Independents and other third parties in our sample, we find that the variance between food policy opinions has increased for many policies.