z-logo
Premium
Single‐Unit‐Cell Catalysis of CO 2 Electroreduction over Sub‐1 nm Cu 9 S 5 Nanowires
Author(s) -
Yang Deren,
Zuo Shouwei,
Yang Haozhou,
Wang Xun
Publication year - 2021
Publication title -
advanced energy materials
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 10.08
H-Index - 220
eISSN - 1614-6840
pISSN - 1614-6832
DOI - 10.1002/aenm.202100272
Subject(s) - catalysis , materials science , nanocrystal , nanowire , electrocatalyst , bimetallic strip , polyoxometalate , nucleation , faraday efficiency , chemical engineering , electrode , crystallography , nanotechnology , electrochemistry , chemistry , organic chemistry , engineering
As a bridge between nanocrystal catalysts and single‐atom catalysts, single‐unit‐cell catalysts seem at first glance to be unavailable for catalysis due to quantum effects and synthetic difficulties. Here, 24 nm Cu 9 S 5 nanowires are synthesized via the LaMer pathway. Interestingly, when polyoxometalate (POM) clusters are introduced during the nucleation process, the 0.9 nm Cu 9 S 5 nanowires are finally formed via covalent co‐assembly, analog to A–B–A–B‐type block co‐polymerization in the polymer field (“A” and “B” represent Cu 9 S 5 unit cells and POM clusters, respectively). Multiple characterizations show that Cu 9 S 5 exists as single‐unit‐cell structure. Therefore, each unit cell can work as an isolated active site. The single‐unit‐cell structure exhibits higher electrocatalytic activity and Faradaic efficiency (FE) of formic acid (82.0% at −0.8 V vs reversible hydrogen electrode (RHE)) during CO 2 electroreduction, while the nanocrystal structure generates HCOO − , methanol, and ethanol with low FEs. This study suggests that the single‐unit‐cell catalyst displays great potential for precise catalysis by the finite size effect.

This content is not available in your region!

Continue researching here.

Having issues? You can contact us here