z-logo
Premium
Charge Transfer from Methylammonium Lead Iodide Perovskite to Organic Transport Materials: Efficiencies, Transfer Rates, and Interfacial Recombination
Author(s) -
Hutter Eline M.,
Hofman JanJaap,
Petrus Michiel L.,
Moes Michiel,
Abellón Ruben D.,
Docampo Pablo,
Savenije Tom J.
Publication year - 2017
Publication title -
advanced energy materials
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 10.08
H-Index - 220
eISSN - 1614-6840
pISSN - 1614-6832
DOI - 10.1002/aenm.201602349
Subject(s) - perovskite (structure) , materials science , iodide , chemical physics , trapping , recombination , charge (physics) , photovoltaics , excitation , organic solar cell , optoelectronics , chemical engineering , photovoltaic system , inorganic chemistry , chemistry , polymer , composite material , ecology , biochemistry , physics , quantum mechanics , gene , engineering , biology , electrical engineering
Perovskite‐based photovoltaics have been rapidly developed, with record power conversion efficiencies now exceeding 22%. In order to rationally design efficient and stable perovskite solar cells, it is important to understand not only charge trapping and recombination events, but also processes occurring at the perovskite/transport material (TM) interface, such as charge transfer and interfacial recombination. In this work, time‐resolved microwave conductivity measurements are performed to investigate these interfacial processes for methylammonium lead iodide and various state‐of‐the‐art organic TMs. A global kinetic model is developed, which accurately describes both the dynamics of excess charges in the perovskite layer and transfer to charge‐specific TMs. The authors conclude that for state‐of‐the‐art materials, such as Spiro‐OMeTAD and PCBM, the charge extraction efficiency is not significantly affected by intra‐band gap traps for trap densities under 10 15 cm –3 . Finally, the transfer rates to C60, PCBM, EDOT‐OMeTPA, and Spiro‐OMeTAD are sufficient to outcompete second order recombination under excitation densities representative for illumination by AM1.5.

This content is not available in your region!

Continue researching here.

Having issues? You can contact us here