Premium
Metal‐Organic Frameworks for Carbon Dioxide Capture and Methane Storage
Author(s) -
Lin Yichao,
Kong Chunglong,
Zhang Qiuju,
Chen Liang
Publication year - 2017
Publication title -
advanced energy materials
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 10.08
H-Index - 220
eISSN - 1614-6840
pISSN - 1614-6832
DOI - 10.1002/aenm.201601296
Subject(s) - carbon capture and storage (timeline) , materials science , flue gas , metal organic framework , energy storage , methane , carbon fibers , process engineering , natural gas , nanotechnology , combustion , clean energy , waste management , adsorption , environmental science , power (physics) , climate change , environmental engineering , engineering , chemistry , ecology , organic chemistry , composite number , physics , quantum mechanics , composite material , biology
In the global transition to a sustainable low‐carbon economy, CO 2 capture and storage technology still plays a critical role for deep emission reduction, particularly for the stationary sources in power generation and industry. However, for small and mobile emission sources in transportation, CO 2 capture is not suitable and it is more practical to use relatively clean energy, such as natural gas. In these two low‐carbon energy technologies, designing highly selective sorbents is one of the key and most challenging steps. Toward this end, metal‐organic frameworks (MOFs) have received continuously intensive attention in the past decades for their highly porous and diversified structures. In this review, the recent progress in developing MOFs for selective CO 2 capture from post‐combustion flue gas and CH 4 storage for vehicle applications are summarized. For CO 2 capture, several promising strategies being used to improve CO 2 adsorption uptake at low pressures are highlighted and compared. In addition, the conventional and novel regeneration techniques for MOFs are also discussed. In the case of CH 4 storage, the flexible and rigid MOFs, whose CH 4 storage capacity is close to the target set by U.S. Department of Energy are particularly emphasized. Finally, the challenge of using MOFs for CH 4 storage is discussed.