z-logo
open-access-imgOpen Access
The Role of Electrolyte Composition in Enabling Li Metal‐Iron Fluoride Full‐Cell Batteries
Author(s) -
Wygant Bryan R.,
Merrill Laura C.,
Harrison Katharine L.,
Talin A. Alec,
Ashby David S.,
Lambert Timothy N.
Publication year - 2022
Publication title -
advanced science
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 5.388
H-Index - 100
ISSN - 2198-3844
DOI - 10.1002/advs.202105803
Subject(s) - electrolyte , cathode , interphase , battery (electricity) , dimethoxyethane , anode , materials science , chemical engineering , electrode , energy density , metal , inorganic chemistry , chemistry , metallurgy , engineering physics , thermodynamics , power (physics) , genetics , physics , engineering , biology
Abstract FeF 3 conversion cathodes, paired with Li metal, are promising for use in next‐generation secondary batteries and offer a remarkable theoretical energy density of 1947 Wh kg −1 compared to 690 Wh kg −1 for LiNi 0.5 Mn 1.5 O 4 ; however, many successful studies on FeF 3 cathodes are performed in cells with a large (>90‐fold) excess of Li that disguises the effects of tested variables on the anode and decreases the practical energy density of the battery. Herein, it is demonstrated that for full‐cell compatibility, the electrolyte must produce both a protective solid‐electrolyte interphase and cathode‐electrolyte interphase and that an electrolyte composed of 1:1.3:3 (m/m) LiFSI, 1,2‐dimethoxyethane, and 1,1,2,2‐tetrafluoroethyl‐2,2,3,3‐tetrafluoropropyl ether fulfills both these requirements. This work demonstrates the importance of verifying electrode level solutions on the full‐cell level when developing new battery chemistries and represents the first full cell demonstration of a Li/FeF 3 cell, with both limited Li and high capacity FeF 3 utilization.

The content you want is available to Zendy users.

Already have an account? Click here to sign in.
Having issues? You can contact us here