Open Access11% Organic Photovoltaic Devices Based on PTB7‐Th: PC 71 BM Photoactive Layers and Irradiation‐Assisted ZnO Electron Transport Layers
Author(s) -
Aqoma Havid,
Park Sujung,
Park HyeYun,
Hadmojo Wisnu Tantyo,
Oh SeungHwan,
Nho Sungho,
Kim Do Hui,
Seo Jeonghoon,
Park Sungmin,
Ryu Du Yeol,
Cho Shinuk,
Jang SungYeon
Publication year - 2018
Publication title -
advanced science
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 5.388
H-Index - 100
ISSN - 2198-3844
DOI - 10.1002/advs.201700858
Subject(s) - materials science , energy conversion efficiency , open circuit voltage , current density , chemical engineering , irradiation , photovoltaic system , nanoparticle , nanotechnology , optoelectronics , voltage , ecology , physics , quantum mechanics , nuclear physics , engineering , biology
The enhancement of interfacial charge collection efficiency using buffer layers is a cost‐effective way to improve the performance of organic photovoltaic devices (OPVs) because they are often universally applicable regardless of the active materials. However, the availability of high‐performance buffer materials, which are solution‐processable at low temperature, are limited and they often require burdensome additional surface modifications. Herein, high‐performance ZnO based electron transporting layers (ETLs) for OPVs are developed with a novel g ‐ray‐assisted solution process. Through careful formulation of the ZnO precursor and g ‐ray irradiation, the pre‐formation of ZnO nanoparticles occurs in the precursor solutions, which enables the preparation of high quality ZnO films. The g ‐ray assisted ZnO (ZnO‐G) films possess a remarkably low defect density compared to the conventionally prepared ZnO films. The low‐defect ZnO‐G films can improve charge extraction efficiency of ETL without any additional treatment. The power conversion efficiency (PCE) of the device using the ZnO‐G ETLs is 11.09% with an open‐circuit voltage ( V OC ), short‐circuit current density ( J SC ), and fill factor (FF) of 0.80 V, 19.54 mA cm ‐2 , and 0.71, respectively, which is one of the best values among widely studied poly[4,8‐bis(5‐(2‐ethylhexyl)thiophen‐2‐yl)benzo[1,2‐b;4,5‐b′]dithiophene‐2,6‐diyl‐alt‐(4‐(2‐ethylhexyl)‐3‐fluorothieno[3,4‐b]thiophene‐)‐2‐carboxylate‐2‐6‐diyl)]: [6,6]‐phenyl‐C 71 ‐butyric acid methyl ester (PTB7‐Th:PC 71 BM)‐based devices.