Premium
Excited‐State Modulation for Controlling Fluorescence and Phosphorescence Pathways toward White‐Light Emission
Author(s) -
Feng Changfu,
Li Shuai,
Xiao Xiaoxiao,
Lei Yilong,
Geng Hua,
Liao Yi,
Liao Qing,
Yao Jiannian,
Wu Yishi,
Fu Hongbing
Publication year - 2019
Publication title -
advanced optical materials
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 2.89
H-Index - 91
ISSN - 2195-1071
DOI - 10.1002/adom.201900767
Subject(s) - phosphorescence , intersystem crossing , fluorescence , photochemistry , luminescence , materials science , excited state , persistent luminescence , intermolecular force , triplet state , cocrystal , singlet state , chemistry , atomic physics , optoelectronics , molecule , hydrogen bond , optics , physics , organic chemistry , thermoluminescence
Luminescence originated from singlet (S 1 ) and triplet (T 1 ) states is categorized as fluorescence and phosphorescence, respectively. Modulation of fluorescence and phosphorescence pathways plays a central role in developing organic luminescent materials, but remains difficult because of the lack of control ways. Here, luminescence of cocrystals of 1,7‐phenanthroline (PR) and 1,4‐diiodotetrafluorobenzene (DITFB) can be switched by adjusting their stoichiometry, from bluish fluorescence for 1:0 pure PR crystal (P1D0) to yellowish phosphorescence for 1:1 PR:DITFB cocrystal (P1D1). More importantly, 2:1 PR:DITFB cocrystal (P2D1) is found to exhibit dual fluorescence and phosphorescence simultaneously, thus giving rise to white‐light emission. Experimental and time‐dependent density‐function‐theory results reveal that although the S 1 and T 1 energies keep invariable, high‐lying T n states introduced in cocrystals decreases the S 1 –T n energy gap, meanwhile multiple intermolecular halogen bonding enhances the spin‐orbital coupling. As a result, the S 1 → T n intersystem crossing rate ( k ISC ) is accelerated by 2 orders of magnitude, making k ISC comparable and faster than the fluorescence decay rate k Fl for P1D0 (fluorescence), P2D1 (dual emissions), and P1D1 (phosphorescence), respectively. The results provide not only a quantum‐mechanical understanding but also a novel strategy to modulate the excited‐state dynamics toward fluorescence and/or phosphorescence emissions for luminescent materials.