Premium
Extracellular Matrix‐Based Strategies for Immunomodulatory Biomaterials Engineering
Author(s) -
Rowley Andrew T.,
Nagalla Raji R.,
Wang SzuWen,
Liu Wendy F.
Publication year - 2019
Publication title -
advanced healthcare materials
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 2.288
H-Index - 90
eISSN - 2192-2659
pISSN - 2192-2640
DOI - 10.1002/adhm.201801578
Subject(s) - extracellular matrix , tissue engineering , scaffold , decellularization , regenerative medicine , context (archaeology) , hyaluronic acid , drug delivery , nanotechnology , materials science , immune system , microbiology and biotechnology , biology , biomedical engineering , stem cell , immunology , engineering , anatomy , paleontology
Abstract The extracellular matrix (ECM) is a complex and dynamic structural scaffold for cells within tissues and plays an important role in regulating cell function. Recently it has become appreciated that the ECM contains bioactive motifs that can directly modulate immune responses. This review describes strategies for engineering immunomodulatory biomaterials that utilize natural ECM‐derived molecules and have the potential to harness the immune system for applications ranging from tissue regeneration to drug delivery. A top‐down approach utilizes full‐length ECM proteins, including collagen, fibrin, or hyaluronic acid‐based materials, as well as matrices derived from decellularized tissue. These materials have the benefit of maintaining natural conformation and structure but are often heterogeneous and encumber precise control. By contrast, a bottom‐up approach leverages immunomodulatory domains, such as Arg–Gly–Asp (RGD), matrix metalloproteinase (MMP)‐sensitive peptides, or leukocyte‐associated immunoglobulin‐like receptor‐1(LAIR‐1) ligands, by incorporating them into synthetic materials. These materials have tunable control over immune cell functions and allow for combinatorial approaches. However, the synthetic approach lacks the full natural context of the original ECM protein. These two approaches provide a broad range of engineering techniques for immunomodulation through material interactions and hold the potential for the development of future therapeutic applications.