Premium
The Roles of the Ge‐Te Core Network and the Sb‐Te Pseudo Network During Rapid Nucleation‐Dominated Crystallization of Amorphous Ge 2 Sb 2 Te 5
Author(s) -
Ohara Koji,
Temleitner László,
Sugimoto Kunihisa,
Kohara Shinji,
Matsunaga Toshiyuki,
Pusztai László,
Itou Masayoshi,
Ohsumi Hiroyuki,
Kojima Rie,
Yamada Noboru,
Usuki Takeshi,
Fujiwara Akihiko,
Takata Masaki
Publication year - 2012
Publication title -
advanced functional materials
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 6.069
H-Index - 322
eISSN - 1616-3028
pISSN - 1616-301X
DOI - 10.1002/adfm.201102940
Subject(s) - amorphous solid , materials science , tellurium , nucleation , crystallization , phase (matter) , antimony , chemical physics , crystallography , germanium , optoelectronics , thermodynamics , physics , chemistry , metallurgy , silicon , quantum mechanics
Ge 2 Sb 2 Te 5 (GST) has demonstrated its outstanding importance among rapid phase‐change (PC) materials, being applied for optical and electrical data storage for over three decades. The mechanism of nanosecond phase change in GST, which is vital for its application, has long been disputed: various, quite diverse scenarios have been proposed on the basis of various experimental and theoretical approaches. Nevertheless, one central question still remains unanswered: why is amorphous GST stable at room temperature for long time while it can rapidly transform to the crystalline phase at high temperature? Here it is revealed for the first time, by modelling the amorphous structure based on synchrotron radiation anomalous X‐ray scattering data, that germanium and tellurium atoms form a “core” Ge‐Te network with ring formation. It is also suggested that the Ge‐Te network can stabilize the amorphous phase at room temperature and can persist in the crystalline phase. On the other hand, antimony does not contribute to ring formation but constitutes a “pseudo” network with tellurium, in which the characteristic Sb–Te distance is somewhat longer than the covalent Sb–Te bond distance. This suggests that the Sb‐Te pseudo network may act as a precursor to forming critical nuclei during the crystallization process. The findings conclude that the Ge‐Te core network is responsible for the outstanding stability and rapid phase change of the amorphous phase while the Sb‐Te pseudo network is responsible for triggering critical nucleation.