Premium
Solution Processable Fluorenyl Hexa‐ peri ‐hexabenzocoronenes in Organic Field‐Effect Transistors and Solar Cells
Author(s) -
Wong Wallace W. H.,
Singh T. Birendra,
Vak Doojin,
Pisula Wojciech,
Yan Chao,
Feng Xinliang,
Williams Evan L.,
Chan Khai Leok,
Mao Qinghui,
Jones David J.,
Ma ChangQi,
Müllen Klaus,
Bäuerle Peter,
Holmes Andrew B.
Publication year - 2010
Publication title -
advanced functional materials
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 6.069
H-Index - 322
eISSN - 1616-3028
pISSN - 1616-301X
DOI - 10.1002/adfm.200901827
Subject(s) - materials science , organic field effect transistor , electron mobility , polymer solar cell , organic semiconductor , charge carrier , organic solar cell , field effect transistor , solar cell , active layer , chemical engineering , optoelectronics , nanotechnology , transistor , thin film transistor , layer (electronics) , polymer , composite material , physics , quantum mechanics , voltage , engineering
The organization of organic semiconductor molecules in the active layer of organic electronic devices has important consequences to overall device performance. This is due to the fact that molecular organization directly affects charge carrier mobility of the material. Organic field‐effect transistor (OFET) performance is driven by high charge carrier mobility while bulk heterojunction (BHJ) solar cells require balanced hole and electron transport. By investigating the properties and device performance of three structural variations of the fluorenyl hexa‐ peri ‐hexabenzocoronene (FHBC) material, the importance of molecular organization to device performance was highlighted. It is clear from 1 H NMR and 2D wide‐angle X‐ray scattering (2D WAXS) experiments that the sterically demanding 9,9‐dioctylfluorene groups are preventing π–π intermolecular contact in the hexakis‐substituted FHBC 4 . For bis‐substituted FHBC compounds 5 and 6 , π–π intermolecular contact was observed in solution and hexagonal columnar ordering was observed in solid state. Furthermore, in atomic force microscopy (AFM) experiments, nanoscale phase separation was observed in thin films of FHBC and [6,6]‐phenyl‐C61‐butyric acid methyl ester (PC 61 BM) blends. The differences in molecular and bulk structural features were found to correlate with OFET and BHJ solar cell performance. Poor OFET and BHJ solar cells devices were obtained for FHBC compound 4 while compounds 5 and 6 gave excellent devices. In particular, the field‐effect mobility of FHBC 6 , deposited by spin‐casting, reached 2.8 × 10 −3 cm 2 V −1 s and a power conversion efficiency of 1.5% was recorded for the BHJ solar cell containing FHBC 6 and PC 61 BM.