Premium
Comparison of Three Different Active Filler Metals Used for Brazing Ceramic‐to‐Ceramic and Ceramic‐to‐Metal
Author(s) -
Bissig V.,
Galli M.,
JanczakRusch J.
Publication year - 2006
Publication title -
advanced engineering materials
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.938
H-Index - 114
eISSN - 1527-2648
pISSN - 1438-1656
DOI - 10.1002/adem.200500234
Subject(s) - brazing , materials science , ceramic , composite material , tin , residual stress , filler (materials) , metallurgy , filler metal , deformation (meteorology) , alloy , welding , arc welding
Three active filler metals were studied to determine their suitability for joining Si3N4‐TiN composite ceramics. The evolution of the bend strength in the different setups could be explained using microstructural analysis, micro‐hardness measurement and finite element modelling. It was observed that residual stresses in ceramic‐to‐metal joints can be decreased more effective with plastic deformation than by reducing the brazing temperature.