Premium
As HIPAA changes loom, patients demand continued confidentiality for SUD records
Author(s) -
Knopf Alison
Publication year - 2019
Publication title -
alcoholism and drug abuse weekly
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
eISSN - 1556-7591
pISSN - 1042-1394
DOI - 10.1002/adaw.32236
Subject(s) - health insurance portability and accountability act , confidentiality , mental health , human services , accountability , business , administration (probate law) , protected health information , substance abuse , health care , medicine , political science , law , psychiatry , health policy , hrhis
In last week's issue, we wrote about the plans by the federal Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) to weaken the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act (HIPAA), citing regulatory burdens and the need for information‐sharing (see ADAW , Jan. 21). The plans, detailed in a request for information (RFI) issued Dec. 12, throw a wrench into the plans by the “make 42 CFR Part 2 like HIPAA” movement, which would erase the federal confidentiality regulation protecting substance use disorder (SUD) treatment records by watering it down to HIPAA standards. Now, with even HIPAA seeming too burdensome, the need is even greater to protect the consent provision of 42 CFR Part 2 — which is basically all that's left after the Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration (SAMHSA) allowed information‐sharing for the vague “health care operations” without consent last year (see ADAW , Jan. 8, 2018). Last week, H. Westley Clark, M.D., J.D., dean's executive professor at Santa Clara University and former director of the Center for Substance Abuse Treatment at the Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration, made this abundantly clear in his comments to ADAW .