z-logo
Premium
Comparative Risk of Cardiovascular Events With Biologic and Synthetic Disease‐Modifying Antirheumatic Drugs in Patients With Rheumatoid Arthritis: A Systematic Review and Meta‐Analysis
Author(s) -
Singh Siddharth,
Fumery Mathurin,
Singh Abha G.,
Singh Namrata,
Prokop Larry J.,
Dulai Parambir S.,
Sandborn William J.,
Curtis Jeffrey R.
Publication year - 2020
Publication title -
arthritis care and research
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 2.032
H-Index - 163
eISSN - 2151-4658
pISSN - 2151-464X
DOI - 10.1002/acr.23875
Subject(s) - medicine , tocilizumab , rheumatoid arthritis , tofacitinib , abatacept , odds ratio , mace , meta analysis , methotrexate , myocardial infarction , rituximab , lymphoma , conventional pci
Objective We performed a systematic review and meta‐analysis to evaluate the comparative effects of tumor necrosis factor inhibitors ( TNF i), non‐ TNF i biologics, and conventional synthetic disease‐modifying antirheumatic drugs (cs DMARD s) on cardiovascular risk in rheumatoid arthritis ( RA ). Methods Using a systematic search through May 8, 2018, we included 14 observational studies in adults with RA treated with TNF i, non‐ TNF i biologics, tofacitinib, or cs DMARD s, reporting the risk of major adverse cardiovascular events ( MACE ) or stroke. Only studies reporting active comparators were included. We performed random effects meta‐analysis and estimated odds ratios ( OR s) and 95% confidence intervals (95% CI s). Results As compared to TNF i, tocilizumab was associated with a decreased risk of MACE ( OR 0.59 [95% CI 0.34–1.00]), whereas cs DMARD s were associated with an increased risk of MACE (cs DMARD s including methotrexate OR 1.45 [95% CI 1.09–1.93]; without methotrexate OR 2.57 [95% CI 1.32–5.00]), without heterogeneity (I 2 = 0%); there was no difference in risk of MACE between abatacept and TNF i ( OR 0.89 [95% CI 0.71–1.11]), or between tocilizumab and abatacept ( OR 0.81 [0.57–1.16]). Based on 11 cohorts (n = 135,053 patients), as compared to TNF i, cs DMARD s were associated with an increased risk of stroke ( OR 1.17 [95% CI 1.01–1.36]); there was no difference in risk of stroke between different biologics (tocilizumab versus TNF i OR 0.98 [95% CI 0.59–1.61]; abatacept versus TNF i OR 1.08 [0.86–1.34]; tocilizumab versus abatacept OR 0.73 [95% CI 0.39–1.38]), without heterogeneity (I 2 = 0%). No comparative studies on cardiovascular risk with tofacitinib were identified. Conclusion Based on meta‐analysis, as compared to TNF i, tocilizumab may be associated with a reduced risk of MACE , whereas cs DMARD s may be associated with an increased risk of MACE and stroke.

This content is not available in your region!

Continue researching here.

Having issues? You can contact us here
Accelerating Research

Address

John Eccles House
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom