Premium
Association Between Anti–Citrullinated Fibrinogen Antibodies and Coronary Artery Disease in Rheumatoid Arthritis
Author(s) -
Hejblum Boris P.,
Cui Jing,
Lahey Lauren J.,
Cagan Andrew,
Sparks Jeffrey A.,
Sokolove Jeremy,
Cai Tianxi,
Liao Katherine P.
Publication year - 2018
Publication title -
arthritis care and research
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 2.032
H-Index - 163
eISSN - 2151-4658
pISSN - 2151-464X
DOI - 10.1002/acr.23444
Subject(s) - rheumatoid arthritis , fibrinogen , medicine , coronary artery disease , cohort , group b , antibody , group a , gastroenterology , autoantibody , immunology
Objective Antibodies against citrullinated fibrinogen (anti–Cit‐fibrinogen) have been implicated in rheumatoid arthritis ( RA ) and associated with cardiovascular risk in RA . The objective of this study was to examine the association between anti–Cit‐fibrinogens and coronary artery disease ( CAD ) outcomes. Methods We performed the study in an RA cohort based in a large academic institution linked with electronic medical record data containing information on CAD outcomes from medical record review. Using a published bead‐based assay method, we measured 10 types of anti–Cit‐fibrinogens. We applied a score test to determine the association between the anti–Cit‐fibrinogens as a group with CAD outcomes. Principal components analysis ( PCA ) was performed to assess whether the anti–Cit‐fibrinogens clustered into groups. Each group was then additionally tested for association with CAD . Sensitivity analyses were also performed using a published International Classification of Disease, Ninth Revision code group for ischemic heart disease ( IHD ) as the outcome. Results We studied 1,006 RA subjects (mean ± SD age 61.0 ± 13.0 years; 72.2% anti–cyclic citrullinated peptide positive). As a group, anti–Cit‐fibrinogen was associated with CAD ( P = 1.1 × 10 −4 ). From the PCA analysis, we observed 3 main groups, of which only 1 group, containing 7 of the 10 anti–Cit‐fibrinogens, was significantly associated with CAD outcomes ( P = 0.015). In the sensitivity analysis, all anti–Cit‐fibrinogens as a group remained significantly associated with IHD ( P = 2.9 × 10 −4 ). Conclusion Anti–Cit‐fibrinogen antibodies as a group were associated with CAD outcomes in our RA cohort, with the strongest signal for association arising from a subset of the autoantibodies.