Premium
Reliability of Assessing Hand Osteoarthritis on Digital Photographs and Associations With Radiographic and Clinical Findings
Author(s) -
Marshall Michelle,
Jonsson Helgi,
Helgadottir Gudrun P.,
Nicholls Elaine,
Windt Danielle,
Myers Helen,
Dziedzic Krysia
Publication year - 2014
Publication title -
arthritis care and research
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 2.032
H-Index - 163
eISSN - 2151-4658
pISSN - 2151-464X
DOI - 10.1002/acr.22225
Subject(s) - medicine , intraclass correlation , osteoarthritis , radiography , physical therapy , intra rater reliability , grading (engineering) , population , inter rater reliability , rating scale , surgery , psychology , confidence interval , psychometrics , clinical psychology , developmental psychology , civil engineering , alternative medicine , environmental health , pathology , engineering
Objective To investigate the reliability and construct validity of an atlas for grading hand osteoarthritis (OA) on photographs in a separate younger community‐dwelling population than the development cohort. Methods Participants were community‐dwelling adults (ages ≥50 years) in North Staffordshire, UK with hand pain or hand problems in the last year who attended a research clinic. High‐quality photographs were taken in a standardized position. A photographic atlas was used to score hand joints (second and third distal interphalangeal [DIP], second and third proximal interphalangeal [PIP], and first carpometacarpal [CMC] joints) and joint groups (DIP, PIP, and CMC joints) for OA on a 0–3 scale. Hand radiographs were graded for OA using the Kellgren/Lawrence (K/L) grading system. Clinical features (nodes, bony enlargement, and deformity) were determined by physical examination. Associations of photographic hand OA grades with radiographic OA and clinical features were determined to assess construct validity. Results In total, 558 participants (mean age 64 years, 62% women) were included in the analyses. Reliability for scoring OA on the photographs was good (mean intrarater intraclass correlation coefficient [ICC] 0.77 and mean interrater ICC 0.71). At the joint level, photographic hand OA grade was positively associated with radiographic OA grade (Spearman's ρ = 0.19–0.57, P < 0.001) and the number of clinical features (Spearman's ρ = 0.36–0.59, P < 0.001). At the person level, individuals with higher global photographic OA scores had higher summed K/L scores and higher percentages meeting the American College of Rheumatology clinical hand OA criteria. Conclusion This photographic scoring system was reliable and a good indicator of hand OA in a separate younger community‐dwelling population than the development cohort. This method of data collection offers researchers a feasible alternative to physical examination and radiography.